< knockout>I went to a fight, and a hockey game broke out
Legalities of the Presence of Violence in the National ice hockey union
Criminal Justice 103
Charn Kingra
March 24th, 2010
The National Hockey League (NHL) is arguably one of the most well-known, well-watched and popular sports leagues in the blameless world. From the NHL down to the junior and amateur ranks, there is a strong sense among the hockey brotherhood that the honourable way to duty a wrong on the ice is to physically labialise ones foe. But the consequences can be lethal, as the Canadian court of justice ashes has documented. This paper will examine the specific representative of Todd Bertuzzi (2004) with respect to the civil liability and criminal responsibility involved, as well as the difficulties that arise for the Canadian justice system from disciplining a long-sanctioned form of sport violence for which very short(p) precedent exists (Verdun-Jones, 2007).
While criminal liability cannot be excluded, the commit take in this paper is that the courts should defer to the disciplinary bodies of the sport leagues because the courts are not always in the best stake to override the disciplinary authority of the NHLs head commissioners and govern the NHL in accordance with the law when at all possible.
In order to properly analyze this case from a effectual level, we first need to examine the events preceding the attack in question. On February 16th, 2004, during a Vancouver Canucks versus Colorado Avalanche game, Avalanche shopping centre Steve Moore injured Canucks team captain Markus Näslund by checking him in the head area after play had stopped firearm Näslund was reaching for the puck ahead of himself with his head down. Näslund, the leagues leading scorer at the time, suffered a minor cut and a bone chip in his...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment