Gun Control "Assault Weapons Ban"

Argument Essay on Assault Weapons Ban

        Congress had approved an transport weapons ban bill. Which result expire on September 2004 if the hot seat does not sign up it. Us pro gun groups will not let this bill even hit the presidents desk for him to sign it. This ban is wrong. Despite the claim by former presidents that this is a matter of vital importance to the public safety. There is miniscule reason to believe that banning these weapons will have any affect on violent crime.

        Suppose a hallway group wants congress to ban death cars. They are a little unclear active what exactly death cars are, except the vehicles seem to share certain characteristics including red paint and speedometers that go above 100mph. These cars are said to be the special vehicles of speeders and inebriate drivers and they are supposedly considered to cause accidents that kill as umpteen people as possible. Supporters of the ban cannot back up their claims with explanations, further they can provide the shocking details of crashes involving death cars.

        The logic behind the assault weapons ban is hardly more impellent then the case against death cars. The legislations success says more about the smirch of disapproval for the Second Amendment than it does about the strong point of arguments for the ban.

        The assault weapons ban forbids making or importing ammo clips holding more then 10 rounds and semi-automatic firearms that accept such(prenominal) clips and have two or more of these features folding stock, side arm grip, bayonet mount, threaded barrel for a flash suppressor, grenade throw mount or even a barrel shroud. The virtue bans 19 firearms by name, but it covers a total of 184 flowing models as well as any new guns that chalk up the description. Even though the scary looking, military...

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper