Comment on the three types of sociological theories, explain
and argue, based on your depository library or Internet research, which type of
system is the most appropriate theory for sociology to adopt.
The three general types of sociological theory are positively charged,
interpretive and hypercritical theory. In determining which theory is the
most appropriate for sociology to adopt, a prefatorial understanding of each
theorys strengths and weaknesses is necessary. In defining each of
these theories, it is important to square up the ontological basis or the
theorys basis for determining what is cognoscible; the epistemological
basis or the theorys relationship between the knower and the knowable;
and, finally, the methodological basis or the theorys method for
gathering data and obtaining knowledge. A. POSITIVISTIC 1.
Ontology. The positivistic theory is based on an ontology of being
a realist. The realistic slant of incontrovertibleness is also known as
determinism. The positivist knows that a realism is protrude there to be
defined and categorized. The hard sciences from the time of Newton and
Decartes have traditionally relied on the positivistic nestle. The
positivist hopes to be able to approximate domain in a detailed
generalization or theory on how reality operates. The theories of a
positivist generally take the form of cause and effect laws describing
the away reality. Robert Merton defined these theorems as clear
verifiable statements of the relationships between specified
variables. 2. Epistemology. Positivism relies on an
objective epistemology. The perceiver remains distant and does not
interact with the observation or experiment.
Values and some(prenominal) other factors
that might lead to bias are to be carefully removed so that the cold,
monological gaze of science fag end be used to analyze the data. The
positivist is an objectivist. 3. Methodology. The methodology
of positivism is experimental and manipulative. The approach is the
same as propounded...
Great! This is what im actually talking about considering the content and the worldly presented! The way it is presented here is not much satisfactory that that might be because of another reason. (no relevance to the essay)
I rattling liked the way you answered the question step by step. The golf links were pretty strong from paragraph to paragraph. I did not respect any run on sentences which is good! You dont lack to be too verbose and instead lacking originality!
The more short the better, but not going too extreme!
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment