To Whom It May Concern:I am writing this letter in response to your dyslogical, racist, and slanderous name ?Negro raper Faints at Inquest? in your newspaper The Tribune. I believe that your depicting of large Thomas is unfair and was created with the sole interest of inciting panic, hysteria, and spite in the white community. I also believe that your failing work is leading to the consequences of rioting in the streets and angry mobs forming in protest of the accusations posted in your paper that whitethorn in fact be false.
Bigger Thomas had been taken and supercharged with murder. Does this mean he is guilty? The laws of the United States state that every man is innocent until proven guilty. Your article insists that Bigger is guilty. Assumptions argon made in your article that may or may non be true. You refer to Bigger Thomas as ?the killer? in your article instead of a slight indicting term such as ?the suspect?. The killer has not been proven yet. I thought newspapers were supposed to tell the truth, not make assumptions bases on measly occurrences that have been portrayed and blown out of proportion.
Your article features many exaggerations that convey a setting to the reader that Bigger Thomas is an evil, ugly, and devilish black man. This is untrue.
From your article I quote: ?He is about five feet nine inches tall and his skin is exceedingly black. His lower jaw protrudes obnoxiously, reminding unmatched of a jungle beast.? Bigger is a struggling tender man that may be in jail instantly for something he did not do. As your customers read this, they will theorise an ugly inhuman-like animal that is looking for the prey of murdering and raping women. This is not what Bigger Thomas is, he is...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment