The general consensus among historians is that there was a difference of confidences betwixt doubting doubting doubting Thomas Jefferson and James Madison on the policies of the description of the report. It is generally believed that Thomas Jefferson felt that there should be inexorable and inflexible interpretation of the Constitution, while James Madison felt that the Constitution was expansible and that many different laws could be derived form a whizz clause. Their views, however, seemed to have switched over the period of 1801-1817 to fit the needs of the time, and so those beliefs were not really set in stone.
In the year 1800, Thomas Jefferson viewed the Constitution as a document that should be understand very strictly. He felt that the plain could not be united if the Federalists were making so many interpretations of the words of the Constitution (Doc. A). He believed that the Constitution was made the way it was purposely because the Framers k impertinent that that was how the country could best use it. An example of how he was a strict constructionist was in 1808 (in the middle of his presidency), when he created the phrase separation between church and state.
He felt that the Constitution does not furnish the National Government with the right to impose religious laws upon the citizens (it sack only make civil laws), and therefore those types of decisions are for the population to make for themselves (Doc. B).
Towards the end of Jeffersons presidency was when the Federalists really lost their great power and when the Democratic-Republicans increased theirs. With the loss of power of his party, James Madison changed his opinion of flexible interpretation to strict, while Jefferson did the opposite. They switched opinions because each believed that, with the changing times, their new views would be more effective in governing.
If you want to guide a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment