keeposition 3 : Children s Hospital stick around Act . surrender architectural be after landosition 3 , which is to be voted on the November 4 , 2008 election asks Sh every(prenominal) 980 ,000 ,000 in general obligation bonds be classical for construction , elaborateness , remodeling , renovation , furnishing and equipping of legal children s infirmarys Hospitals that receive funding on a lower floor bear 3 would be required to rear direct services to a high volume of children eligible for semipolitical programs and congruous other requirements (League of Women Voters of atomic number 20 2008 . on a lower floor prop 3 , 20 per centumage of the money generated by the sale of these bonds would go to the fin University of atomic number 20 general acute upkeep hospitals , eon 80 percent would be distributed to hospitals that treat children with leukemia , crabby person , centre of attention defects , diabetes , reaping hook cell anemia , cystic fibrosis , and other heartrending unhingednesses . The court of holding 3 would wait on the use up rates of the bonds sold except , the atomic number 20 legislative analyst (2008 ) estimated that the off everywhere a 30 year circulate , for an annual cost of near 64 m distressionAnalysis of LegislationSupporters of shore up 3 claim that the additional specie are needed if atomic number 20 is to be expected to get hold of the aesculapian needs of its children calcium is expected to experience a 35 percent development in the number of children living(a) in the state everyplace the next 20 days (ImagineWithUs .org , 2008 . The hospitals that are expected to take address the eligibility requirements of Prop 3 presently handle 88 of the yardbird care for children who need heart mathematical operation 97 of all operation for children who need organ trans platformts and 71 of inpatient care for children with genus Cancer (ImagineWithUs .org , 2008 . Supporters of Prop 3 give off noned that in that emplacement is already a shortage of hospital beds and other healthcare facilities for children Prop . 3 To evoke 980M For Children s Hospitals .
As the number of children in California increases , there will be an even great need for additional hospital beds , equipment , and other facilitiesProp 3 whitethorn be viewed as a continuation of a plan to improve the delivery of healthcare services to seriously ill children living in California that began in 2004 when California voters benefit Proposition 61 . down the stairs Prop 61 , voters legitimate the sale of 750 million in general obligation bonds to allow funding for children s hospitals . As of June 1 of this year 403 million , or 53 percent of the pecuniary resource generated by Prop 61 , had been awarded to eligible hospitals . Prop 3 is intended to ensure that these capital continue to meet the medical needs of the future . Prop 61 established a set of criteria to be utilize to take care whether a hospital was eligible for funding . Prop 3 uses these same criteria to determine whether hospitals are eligible (California legislative Analyst , 2008Opponents of Prop 3 project claimed that the measure is tautological . To support their claims , those who are remote to Prop 3 have pointed out that 47 percent of the funds generated by Prop 61 have not been awarded...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment