The Armistice of 1850

The Armistice of 1850 With the belief of their schoolboyish awkwards manifest destiny, and achievement over Mexico in the Mexican-the Statesn war, the United States of America conquered most of the western portion of their continent. patch obtaining large territories of land finished victories from warfare and at the cost of bargained prices, this proud rural area open itself with an immense crisis sitting in spite of appearance the palms of their hands. As the improvement of the United States came by means of territorial reserve gains, their triumphant progress was met with digression.Although smart territories were under the possession of the United States, m every(prenominal) a nonher(prenominal) a(prenominal) leaders of this advocateful acres were unsure whether their impertinently acquired land was fit to be a dirt of assuage deformity or thrall. While m either proposed arguments for pro- thralldom land, many counter acted with guiltless soil proposals an d arguments. During the stratum of 1850, the United States of America managed to palliate the tightness between those at opposite spectrums of this opposite through the agree of 1850.Before the passage of the via media of 1850, many of the United States leaders open up themselves at odds with adept an an different(prenominal). john C. Calhoun, a publically cognise pro- thrall coitionman, recalld that break ones backry should not tolerate been excluded from territories prior to introduction to state hood. Calhoun supposition that Congress did not have the power to regulate slavery in the nations pertly acquired territories.In Calhouns Speech on the entrance fee of calcium- and the General State of the Union, he assesses the constitution of the Union and the needs for its overall preservation. In the beginning of Calhouns speech, he clearly commitd that the state of the Union was at constipation collectible to its division, and was at the verge of peachy disast er and disunion. Although Calhoun did not provide a solution for the unity of the country, he did on the other hand argue that the power of the Union rested upon the Northern majority. At that date there was nearly a perfect equilibrium between the two, which afforded wide-cut means to each to protect itself against the enmity of the other but, as it now stands, one section has the exclusive power of autocratic the Government, which leaves the other without any adequate means of protecting itself against its encroachment and oppression, wrote Calhoun. Calhoun justified his intellection on the North oppressing the southmost through the southeasterlys deprivation of territory in the Northwest Ordinance, the Missouri Compromise, and the surgery Territory.Calhoun, like the other representatives of the southern states, completed that the institution of slavery would either have to be fought for or the Union would lastly abolish it. It will be found in the belief of the people o f the southern States, as prevalent as the discontentedness itself, that they cannot remain, as things now are, consistently with whiteness and safety, in the Union, stated the Congressman. Calhoun believed that the South had no via media to offer to the North, but exactly that of the Constitution.The Congressman placed the burden and the indebtedness of the preservation of the nation at bottom the Northerners hands. argue to Calhouns view, Congressman David Wilmot believed that the institution of slavery should have been banned from all the newly acquired territory of the west. He was adamant that Congress possessed the power to regulate slavery in these new territories. David Wilmots Wilmot supplying urged the banning of slavery within any territory acquired fromMexico from theMexican American Waror any territory acquired in the future. Provided,That, as an express and fundamental position to the acquisition of any territory from the country of Mexico by the United Sta tes, by sexual abstention of any treaty which may be negotiated between them, and to the use by the decision maker of the moneys herein appropriated, neither slavery nor unwilled servitude shall ever exist in any part of said territory, except for crime, whereof the company shall first be duly convicted, wrote Wilmot. Although the Wilmot supply was an unsuccessful amendment, Wilmots view of degage soil became a rallying bloom for opponents of slavery.Wilmot was adamant that all land gained within the United States of America should be free of slavery. While Calhoun and Wilmot show the extreme views of the pro-slavery South and the free soil North, the Compromise of 1850 managed to corroborate the sectioned divided views of Congress for the scant(p) term. TheCompromise of 1850was an amalgamation of eight obvious orders which managed to ease the confrontation between thefree states of the North and the slave statesof theSouthin regards to the newly acquired territories from the Mexican-American War.The compromise was drafted byKentucky Congressman,enthalpy Clay, in which avoidedSouthern secession, reduced sectioned conflict, and prevented civil war. The Compromise of 1850 allowed for California to be admitted as one of the States of the Union, as presbyopic as it was a free state. It too banned slavery in upper-case letter D. C. Resolved, That it is inexpedient to abolish slavery in the District of Columbia. This compromise also do Texas surrender its border to the Rio del Norte to New Mexico, and allowed Texas to broadcast its debt to that the national government.The Compromise of1850 also forbidden Congress from introducing or excluding slavery from the nations newly acquired territory, and ordered that the territorial governments were to decide upon the issue of slavery. In other words, the new territories actions on the institution of slavery came from popular sovereignty. Although slave trade was prohibit from Washington D. C. , the compro mise managed to preserve slavery, plot of ground demanding for the restitution and delivery of persons bound to inspection and repair or labor in any State, who may escape into any other State or Territory in the Union.Northerners became infuriated of the idea that gala affair slaves, upon capture, were to be returned to their masters of the South. This precedent became known as The Fugitive Slave transaction of 1850. This act became the sole prize of the South for their compromise in allowing the admission of California to be a free state. non just did the South manage to assert their traditional itinerarys of enslaving Africans, or African Americans, but they also managed to gain more(prenominal) power over their slaves.While many viewed the Compromise of 1850 with pleasure, William Seward opposed Clays compromise which managed to cause momentary peace within the Union. Seward found discontent with the compromise because it was founded on many unconstitutional grounds. Se ward believed that the states were unequal due to slavery, and that slavery should not exist. He thought that slavery was unconstitutional whether classified as property or not, because it is (was) repugnant to the fairness of nature and of nations. In no way did Seward find the compromise constitutional because he felt slavery was unconstitutional.On the flip side, total heat Clay believed that the Compromise of 1850 was a observe for his nation to incur reunited. He demonstrated this by addressing the president in A General Review of the debate on the Compromise Bills by stating, I believe from the bottom of my soul, that the measure is the re-union of this Union. I believe that it is the dove of peace, which, taking its aerial passage from the dome of the capitol, carries the glad tidings of ensure peace and restored harmony to all the remotest extremities of this distracted land. Its clear that Clay believed the compromise was drawn out for the betterment of his young nati on, in hopes that it would reconcile their sectional differences, and become one whole nation again. In 1850, many believed that the Compromise of 1850 had solved the sectional conflicts between the Northern free-soilers and the Southern slave holders. Although there were those who opposed the compromise, for the time being it managed to ease the tension between a divided nation.Although the Compromise of 1850 was an act in which all parties had to give up primal ground, it allowed the nation to momentarily fade into enjoyment for a couple of years. Its bad to believe that the expansionists of our country would have predicted these problems tour trying to improve our country. Our nations manifest destiny at the time seemed to be the answer to improve upon a young nation, but the newly acquired territories from Mexico only stirred up intense emotions and caused for greater division within the nation. Although the Compromise of 1850 managed to ease tension, it ultimately did not cease sectional conflict.