Violent Media Is Good for Kids

Violent Media is Good for Kids Analysis From infancy onward, pargonnts and teachers have drilled into the new-fangled generation that fury should be avoided at all costs. They have preached cooperation, tolerance, and exploitation ones words as tactics to combat delicate situations. Although those lessons are valid, Gerald Jones claims in that location is an alternative way. In his essay, Violent Media is Good for Kids, Jones argues that original violence- bonking cartoons, bloody videogames, toy guns-gives infantren a rooster to master their rage (Jones).In opposite words, media violence, mappingd correctly, can serve as an alternative method for designering by adolescence. By reading and piece of writing violent stories, children are satisfactory to communicate themselves safely and even escape from the sometimes harsh substantiveity. Jones effectively supports this berth using the three rhetorical appeals- ethos, pathos, and logos. To affirm his credibility on th e matter, Jones employs twain tactics. First, he goes into detail about his expertise and past history with media violence to confirm his credibility as the speaker. Then, he intentions the powerful tool of disprover to show the credibility of his argument.Throughout the essay, Jones discusses his past with violent media. He begins with discussing his professional go as a comic book writer. Later, Jones mentions his three-year long project with Dr. Melanie Moore, a psychologist who works with urban teens. This project produced Joness most useful tool in using violent media for good. According to Jones, his program, Power Play, benefactors young raft improve their self-knowledge and sense of potency through heroic, combative storytelling (Jones). Discussing his past with the nation of violent media makes the audience feel like Jones is a competent and real source on the matter.To further contri thoe to ethos, Jones uses a rebuttal. In his essay, he mentions that many psycholo gists argue that violent stories breed more violence- such as the recent increase in columbine shootings. They say hoi polloi use media violence as a driving force for real emotional state violence. Jones acknowledges these points. However, he refutes them by saying that its helped hundreds of people for e realone its hurt, and it can help far more if we learn how to use it (Jones). In other words, when we pack violent media into heroic battles of good versus evil, it can empower a child in need.This rebuttal contributes to the objectivity of the essay. It shows that the author did his research so sound that he can recognize opposing viewpoints and refute them. The author too effectively supports his thesis through pathos. To evoke vigorous emotion in his readers, Jones appeals to the audiences feeling of vulnerability in their youth. Recognizing that during adolescence most people feel powerless, he tells engaging stories of his own and his sons start to power through comic books to give the audience something to connect to.As these stories are told, readers reminisce about those days, and feel joy in knowing that there was a happy ending. The feelings created make the audience look positively at the essay and relate to it. Lastly, Jones uses logos to solidify his argument with concrete evidence. This is through with(p) by giving two real- support examples of girls that were helped through childhood by writing violent media. In both cases, Jones personally assisted these girls during a difficult time, and got them started on their path to future successes. The first example involves a undersized girl, Emily, whose parents were separated.Her main problem was her violent fantasies. Because she didnt have a decent mercantile establishment, she acted out aggressively. Jones stepped in and channeled her fantasies into stories. At the end of the day, she was still fiery and strong, but she was able to control herself in public. In fact, she even became a assimilator leader in her school. In this case, violent media gave a child an outlet for her aggression. The second example involved an older girl in a truly chaotic family situation. She was surrounded by fighting, alcohol, and peer pressure. Jones stepped in with the power of writing.His use of the Power Play program helped the girl escape from her reality. In the girls stories, she was powerful and invulnerable. She was able to ignore the world discharge on around her for a period of time. This proved to be very beneficial. She stayed out of trouble, and grew up to be a writer and political activist. In this case, Jones showed how media violence helped someone power through adolescence and contribute to a very successful future. Jones uses the two examples above to drive home his argument. By employing real life examples, he is able to not only provide concrete evidence, but also put a face to the fact.Instead of spewing a rock of facts, he gives two examples the audience co uld relate to and better visualize. This makes for a stronger use of logos. It seems that Gerald Jones had his work cut out for him in writing this essay. He had to output the hardwired belief that violence is bad and convince the world that Through submerging in imaginary combat and identification with a violent protagonist, children adopt the rage theyve stifled, come to fear it less, and become more capable of utilizing it against lifes challenges (Jones).By using ethos to give credibility to himself and his argument, pathos to evoke strong emotion and connect the reader to the essay, and logos to make the argument solid, Jones is able to effectively argue his thesis. Work Cited Jones, Gerard. Violent Media is Good for Kids. Current Issues and suffer Questions. 9th Edition. Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau, Eds. Boston Bedford St. Martins Press, 2011. 195-199. Print.