Russian Revolution : Model for other Revolutionary Movements

The workers trade in their labor and be alienated from the product of their labor as a consequence. The workers do not own the means of production. In our present cordial structure, it is the capitalist who owns the means of production, and this person sells the product of the labor of the workers. Marx sees this as the exploitation of one class by another, finding that it produces class hostilities base on material inequalities. The class oppose is the specify fact of societal life and leads in time to the flushed overthrow of the capitalist class by the working class, trail to the dictatorship of the parturiencye for a time until a completely egalitarian friendship is produced. Marx in Das Kapital notes that the workers who are forced to sell their labor become nothing more than commodities in the economic market:

Marx preached that the only class which. under capitalism, produced more wealth than it enjoyed was the working class, the proletariat. (Lerner, Meacham & Burns, p. 876)

Marx's idea of human nature is seen in his impression of the force of invoice, in his theory of revolution and of the class struggle leading to revolution, and especially in his concept of alienation based on economic relationships. The human being is defined in call of work, production, and his or her relationship to what is produced. Marx found there to be alienation in the individual's loss of control, of personal wholeness, a

Lenin describes the oppression noted by Marx in terms of imperialism as a stage in capitalism, and he sees monopoly as a form of imperialism. He also sees imperialism as a form of capitalism in transition, "or, more precisely, as adynamic capitalism" (Knoebel, p. 582). Lenin examines the elements of the writings of Marx and Engels and in general agrees with the idea that history has developed on economic grounds and that it has tended toward the classless society over time.

He sees, however, a need for the dictatorship of the proletariat to be more violent and more oppressive than Marx makes it seem, and Lenin would drive its power against the capitalists and exploiters who had dominated in the earlier era as a way of freeing society from their domination in the future and from the effects of their domination in the past:

angiotensin-converting enzyme of the interesting things about the Russian Revolution is that it took place in a region that had not achieved the level of capitalism called for by Marx and Engels as a precursor to the revolution of the proletariat. Lenin did not entrust it was necessary to wait for a stage of capitalist tuition during which the bourgeoisie would be in control, and so he skipped that misuse by simply declaring that Russia already was a capitalist country:

Pipes, R. (1990). The Russian Revolution. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Lerner, R. E., Meacham, S., & Burns, E. M. (1988). Western civilizations: Their history and their culture. New York: W.W. Norton.

The October rise which brought the Bolsheviks to power is less of a watershed than is customarily conjectural; it might more aptly be compared to a change of gears, an acceleration of tempo. As early as the spring of 1917 the grass organizations constituted an incipient "counter-authority," an alternative power structure rivalling that headed by the weak Provisional Government. This rudimentary apparatus was then taken over by the Bolsheviks and redirected to form a governmen
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!