The Selfish Gene by Dr. Weiner

"I would try to remedy them both," he said. "I know that's not part of your question, alone that is the way it would happen. We would probably all(prenominal) three drown in such an attempt, but the plain truth is, that is how I would do it. I wouldn't know at the moment of decision that I could only save one, and, as a father, I wouldn't abandon myself to lose either."

This second answer, I believe, points out both a support for the evolutionary biology position and a taint in its study. First, the flaw; My friend has pointed out what is a paradox with the ecological validity of the Weiner experiment. Weiner's question

orces a false choice on the person.

In the existent world, as my friend noted, he would not know the moment of his choice and would choose to try to save both. In the aftermath, all three might drown, or the father might sprain tired and lose his grip on one or the other of the children and save the other. That is not necessarily a choice, it is an accident. So, the estimation experiment lacks validity. However, my friends answer of "both," although not in the scope of the experiment, in truth verifies Richad Dawkins' concept of "the selfish gene." My friend's instinct is to save all of his genes. He does not know, he
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!